Piltdown hoax dating technique
Britain was largely ignored until in 1912 Charles Dawson found pieces of a skull in a quarry in Piltdown; it was thought to be that of an ancient Pleistocene hominid.In the following years between 19 another skull was found and an elephant molar and canine tooth were also discovered.However, we must be careful to note whether or not the fossil comes from the mixed strata zone of the filled in hole..
A wide variety of results found some of the pieces were much younger than others.
In1953 Piltdown man was revealed as a hoax by Wiener, Le Gros Clark and Oakley.
By this time Piltdown man had been largely ignored and marginalized as more discoveries were made and the remains fitted in less and less with the developing theory.
This relative dating method is based on the fact that there are specific progressive chemical changes in skeletal remains that result from burial underground.
As time passes, the organic components of bone (mostly fat) are lost primarily through bacterial action.As a result, the amount of fluorine Fluorine analysis can be used only as a relative dating method because the rate of decay and the amount of dissolved minerals in the ground water varies from site to site.